For the Women

(notes by Sharad Keskar and John McGivering)

Publication history

ORG (Volume 8, page 5164) lists this poem as Verse No. 243. It was published in the CMG, unsigned, on 18 February 1887, with the heading ‘Ave Imperatrix, Moriturae Te Salutant !’ (Hail, Empress, the women about to die salute thee) an echo of the traditional formula of greeting to the Roman Emperor by gladiators entering the arena and facing death.

The poem was reprinted in the Pioneer on 22 February 1887. Stanzas 5 and 6 were used as a heading for Chapter 10 of The Naulahka (1892) and published in a collection of Rhymed Chapter Headings from the book in the same year. See also David Alan Richards, p. 142.

The poem is collected, with the eighth stanza omitted (marked here in brackets) in:

  • The Outward Bound Edition
  • The Edition de LuxeEarly Verse, 1900
  • The Sussex Edition, Volume 32, page 97
  • The Burwash Edition, Volume 25.
  • Early Verse Edited by Andrew Rutherford. OUP 1986

We have used the text from Rutherford’s edition of Early Verse with the advantage of his notes.



Rutherford writes:

In 1885 Lady Dufferin (wife of the Viceroy) had launched an appeal fund with which her own name was associated, for supplying female medical advice and instruction to the women of India. ‘They suffered both from medical ignorance and from the difficulty of providing access for male doctors, because of the seclusion imposed on them by rules of purdah. This poem appeared on the same page of the CMG as a report of the laying of the foundation-stone of Lady Aitchison’s Hospital for Women in Lahore, under the general auspices of Lady Dufferin’s Fund.

Dr Gillian Sheehan points out that on 18 February 1887 the laying of the foundation stone for Lady Aichison’s Hospital for women in Lahore was reported in the CMG accompanied by these verses. The hospital initially had 100 beds and was for treating obstetrical and gynaecological cases.


This is a heartfelt plea for proper medical attention for the women of India who suffered needlessly as the tradition of purdah (seclusion) did not permit them to be seen by men who were not related, so they could not be attended by male doctors. Lady Dufferin’s Fund was launched to remedy this dreadful state of affairs by raising money to supply hospitals with female medical and nursing staff, a cause that had Kipling’s full support.

For another poem in support of Lady Dufferin and her Fund, see “The Song of the Women” and our Notes which contain more information on the lady and her husband the Viceroy.

Kipling and the women of India

Sharad Keskar writes:

How sad that Kipling should be accused of misogyny when here’s a poem full of concerns “For the Women” –“Are all our gifts for men alone, or may your women share?” Thus the twenty-one year old Kipling, possibly by early association with Indian servants, is drawn to the native community, their ways and dialect, which later will enable him to observe with a good measure of intuitive understanding; and later still use in “The Song of the Women”, The Naulahka and “William the Conqueror” (The Day’s Work. 1898)

Hinduism is both ancient and protean. Hindu communities have varying customs, symbols and rituals. For instance not all Hindus resort to the purdah. The fact that Kipling mentions it in the poem, places it in Northern India, where he would have been at the time.

As for the harsh and, as it happens, inaccurate “jibe”, that is not Kipling’s intention. He is using the universally accepted description of Hindus, as a people who reverence the cow, and resorts to poetic licence. Instead of using the word ‘Hindus’, which wouldn’t scan or rhyme with the foregoing “teach us now”, he uses “Servants of the Cow—”
Verse Five of the poem creates a vivid picture of the “women only” room for childbirth. There the busy dahees or mid-wives are doing their best, while chanting and dancing women appease the gods. For Hindus, childbirth is fraught with dangers that are both obstetric as well as open to nazur–the “evil eye”—the ‘envy’ spell that can harm mother and child. Hence “The Hundred Danger Time”, a native dialect hyperbole used commonly to describe a situation fraught with dangers.

Asked what the risks and hazards are during childbirth, the mid-wife is very likely to reply ‘ek sor’, that is ‘one hundred-fold’. ‘Hundred’ lends emphasis. It stands for ‘countless’ or ‘umpteen’ in Western usage. To counteract the ‘evil eye’, “Birth-fires” are lit, in the already torrid room, for keeping the evil spirits at bay and for the casting out of ‘nazur’—the evil eye—by throwing salt, dried chillies, and oil into the fire. The rituals may vary, but the “Birth-fires” are invariably lit.

Sometimes, and Kipling would have known of this, when news of a birth reaches any hermaphrodite community, a troupe of them arrive and sing to the accompaniment of clapping, dancing and drums outside the house or hut. They are there to claim the child, if he or she is born hermaphrodite. The child’s family usually agree to let the child go, rather than bear the shame of abnormality. [S.K.]

Notes on the Text

[Verse 1]

a riven land This verse refers to the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, and the reconstruction and development of the country afterwards to make good the social and physical destruction of 1857.

code in this context a legal code or body of laws.

[Verse 3]

Servants of the Cow the cow is sacred to Hindus.

[Verse 4]

The curse God laid on Eve In the book of Genesis (3, 16) it is written:

‘Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception: in sorrow thou shalt thou bring forth children: and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.’

[Verse 5]

the Hundred Danger Time. See Sharad Keskar’s note above.

sootak Sharad Keskar writes: sootak [sutak] is the state of ritual impurity following birth, and has nothing to do with the physical state of the room or the mother. The Jewish purification period after birth is forty days, when the mother is not to be approached. Similarly the Hindus have a period when the woman is considered “unclean” ritually. soot as a root to the word sootak means ‘thread’. After birth has taken place, the midwife ties a ritual thread on the umbilicus or navel. That possibly explains the use of the term.

[Verse 6]

‘spite an abbreviation of ‘despite’, in spite of.

the Birth-fire’s breath See Sharad Keskar’s note above.

haunt her home in death Kipling writes in Kim, Chapter VIII, p. 197:

A churel is the peculiarly malignant ghost of a woman who has died in child-birth. She haunts lonely roads, her feet are trurned backwards on the ankles, and she leads men to torment.

See also “My Own True Ghost Story” (Wee Willie Winkie p. 156, line 6.)

[Verse 9]

boon gift, blessing, advantage,

purdah literally, a curtain screening women from sight of strangers, more generally, the Indian tradition of secluding women. See Kim chapter IV, where the Sahiba stays behind the curtains of her cart, although from time to time when chatting with the Lama she is less than strict about her seclusion.


[S.K./J McG.]

©Sharad Keskar and John McGivering 2011 All rights reserved